San Marino Bankruptcy Attorney

TITLE 11 - BANKRUPTCY
CHAPTER 5 - CREDITORS, THE DEBTOR, AND THE ESTATE
    SUBCHAPTER I - CREDITORS AND CLAIMS

-HEAD-
    Sec. 502. Allowance of claims or interests

-STATUTE-
      (a) A claim or interest, proof of which is filed under section
    501 of this title, is deemed allowed, unless a party in interest,
    including a creditor of a general partner in a partnership that is
    a debtor in a case under chapter 7 of this title, objects.
      (b) Except as provided in subsections (e)(2), (f), (g), (h) and
    (i) of this section, if such objection to a claim is made, the
    court, after notice and a hearing, shall determine the amount of
    such claim in lawful currency of the United States as of the date
    of the filing of the petition, and shall allow such claim in such
    amount, except to the extent that - 
        (1) such claim is unenforceable against the debtor and property
      of the debtor, under any agreement or applicable law for a reason
      other than because such claim is contingent or unmatured;
        (2) such claim is for unmatured interest;
        (3) if such claim is for a tax assessed against property of the
      estate, such claim exceeds the value of the interest of the
      estate in such property;
        (4) if such claim is for services of an insider or attorney of
      the debtor, such claim exceeds the reasonable value of such
      services;
        (5) such claim is for a debt that is unmatured on the date of
      the filing of the petition and that is excepted from discharge
      under section 523(a)(5) of this title;
        (6) if such claim is the claim of a lessor for damages
      resulting from the termination of a lease of real property, such
      claim exceeds - 
          (A) the rent reserved by such lease, without acceleration,
        for the greater of one year, or 15 percent, not to exceed three
        years, of the remaining term of such lease, following the
        earlier of - 
            (i) the date of the filing of the petition; and
            (ii) the date on which such lessor repossessed, or the
          lessee surrendered, the leased property; plus

          (B) any unpaid rent due under such lease, without
        acceleration, on the earlier of such dates;

        (7) if such claim is the claim of an employee for damages
      resulting from the termination of an employment contract, such
      claim exceeds - 
          (A) the compensation provided by such contract, without
        acceleration, for one year following the earlier of - 
            (i) the date of the filing of the petition; or
            (ii) the date on which the employer directed the employee
          to terminate, or such employee terminated, performance under
          such contract; plus

          (B) any unpaid compensation due under such contract, without
        acceleration, on the earlier of such dates;

        (8) such claim results from a reduction, due to late payment,
      in the amount of an otherwise applicable credit available to the
      debtor in connection with an employment tax on wages, salaries,
      or commissions earned from the debtor; or
        (9) proof of such claim is not timely filed, except to the
      extent tardily filed as permitted under paragraph (1), (2), or
      (3) of section 726(a) of this title or under the Federal Rules of
      Bankruptcy Procedure, except that a claim of a governmental unit
      shall be timely filed if it is filed before 180 days after the
      date of the order for relief or such later time as the Federal
      Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure may provide, and except that in a
      case under chapter 13, a claim of a governmental unit for a tax
      with respect to a return filed under section 1308 shall be timely
      if the claim is filed on or before the date that is 60 days after
      the date on which such return was filed as required.

      (c) There shall be estimated for purpose of allowance under this
    section - 
        (1) any contingent or unliquidated claim, the fixing or
      liquidation of which, as the case may be, would unduly delay the
      administration of the case; or
        (2) any right to payment arising from a right to an equitable
      remedy for breach of performance.

      (d) Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of this section, the
    court shall disallow any claim of any entity from which property is
    recoverable under section 542, 543, 550, or 553 of this title or
    that is a transferee of a transfer avoidable under section 522(f),
    522(h), 544, 545, 547, 548, 549, or 724(a) of this title, unless
    such entity or transferee has paid the amount, or turned over any
    such property, for which such entity or transferee is liable under
    section 522(i), 542, 543, 550, or 553 of this title.
      (e)(1) Notwithstanding subsections (a), (b), and (c) of this
    section and paragraph (2) of this subsection, the court shall
    disallow any claim for reimbursement or contribution of an entity
    that is liable with the debtor on or has secured the claim of a
    creditor, to the extent that - 
        (A) such creditor's claim against the estate is disallowed;
        (B) such claim for reimbursement or contribution is contingent
      as of the time of allowance or disallowance of such claim for
      reimbursement or contribution; or
        (C) such entity asserts a right of subrogation to the rights of
      such creditor under section 509 of this title.

      (2) A claim for reimbursement or contribution of such an entity
    that becomes fixed after the commencement of the case shall be
    determined, and shall be allowed under subsection (a), (b), or (c)
    of this section, or disallowed under subsection (d) of this
    section, the same as if such claim had become fixed before the date
    of the filing of the petition.
      (f) In an involuntary case, a claim arising in the ordinary
    course of the debtor's business or financial affairs after the
    commencement of the case but before the earlier of the appointment
    of a trustee and the order for relief shall be determined as of the
    date such claim arises, and shall be allowed under subsection (a),
    (b), or (c) of this section or disallowed under subsection (d) or
    (e) of this section, the same as if such claim had arisen before
    the date of the filing of the petition.
      (g)(1) A claim arising from the rejection, under section 365 of
    this title or under a plan under chapter 9, 11, 12, or 13 of this
    title, of an executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor
    that has not been assumed shall be determined, and shall be allowed
    under subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section or disallowed
    under subsection (d) or (e) of this section, the same as if such
    claim had arisen before the date of the filing of the petition.
      (2) A claim for damages calculated in accordance with section 562
    shall be allowed under subsection (a), (b), or (c), or disallowed
    under subsection (d) or (e), as if such claim had arisen before the
    date of the filing of the petition.
      (h) A claim arising from the recovery of property under section
    522, 550, or 553 of this title shall be determined, and shall be
    allowed under subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section, or
    disallowed under subsection (d) or (e) of this section, the same as
    if such claim had arisen before the date of the filing of the
    petition.
      (i) A claim that does not arise until after the commencement of
    the case for a tax entitled to priority under section 507(a)(8) of
    this title shall be determined, and shall be allowed under
    subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section, or disallowed under
    subsection (d) or (e) of this section, the same as if such claim
    had arisen before the date of the filing of the petition.
      (j) A claim that has been allowed or disallowed may be
    reconsidered for cause. A reconsidered claim may be allowed or
    disallowed according to the equities of the case. Reconsideration
    of a claim under this subsection does not affect the validity of
    any payment or transfer from the estate made to a holder of an
    allowed claim on account of such allowed claim that is not
    reconsidered, but if a reconsidered claim is allowed and is of the
    same class as such holder's claim, such holder may not receive any
    additional payment or transfer from the estate on account of such
    holder's allowed claim until the holder of such reconsidered and
    allowed claim receives payment on account of such claim
    proportionate in value to that already received by such other
    holder. This subsection does not alter or modify the trustee's
    right to recover from a creditor any excess payment or transfer
    made to such creditor.
      (k)(1) The court, on the motion of the debtor and after a
    hearing, may reduce a claim filed under this section based in whole
    on an unsecured consumer debt by not more than 20 percent of the
    claim, if - 
        (A) the claim was filed by a creditor who unreasonably refused
      to negotiate a reasonable alternative repayment schedule proposed
      on behalf of the debtor by an approved nonprofit budget and
      credit counseling agency described in section 111;
        (B) the offer of the debtor under subparagraph (A) - 
          (i) was made at least 60 days before the date of the filing
        of the petition; and
          (ii) provided for payment of at least 60 percent of the
        amount of the debt over a period not to exceed the repayment
        period of the loan, or a reasonable extension thereof; and

        (C) no part of the debt under the alternative repayment
      schedule is nondischargeable.

      (2) The debtor shall have the burden of proving, by clear and
    convincing evidence, that - 
        (A) the creditor unreasonably refused to consider the debtor's
      proposal; and
        (B) the proposed alternative repayment schedule was made prior
      to expiration of the 60-day period specified in paragraph
      (1)(B)(i).

-SOURCE-
    (Pub. L. 95-598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2579; Pub. L. 98-353, title
    III, Sec. 445, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 373; Pub. L. 99-554, title
    II, Secs. 257(j), 283(f), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3115, 3117; Pub.
    L. 103-394, title II, Sec. 213(a), title III, Sec. 304(h)(1), Oct.
    22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4125, 4134; Pub. L. 109-8, title II, Sec.
    201(a), title VII, Sec. 716(d), title IX, Sec. 910(b), Apr. 20,
    2005, 119 Stat. 42, 130, 184.)


                       HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES                   

                          LEGISLATIVE STATEMENTS                      
      The House amendment adopts a compromise position in section
    502(a) between H.R. 8200, as passed by the House, and the Senate
    amendment. Section 502(a) has been modified to make clear that a
    party in interest includes a creditor of a partner in a partnership
    that is a debtor under chapter 7. Since the trustee of the
    partnership is given an absolute claim against the estate of each
    general partner under section 723(c), creditors of the partner must
    have standing to object to claims against the partnership at the
    partnership level because no opportunity will be afforded at the
    partner's level for such objection.
      The House amendment contains a provision in section 502(b)(1)
    that requires disallowance of a claim to the extent that such claim
    is unenforceable against the debtor and unenforceable against
    property of the debtor. This is intended to result in the
    disallowance of any claim for deficiency by an undersecured
    creditor on a non-recourse loan or under a State antideficiency
    law, special provision for which is made in section 1111, since
    neither the debtor personally, nor the property of the debtor is
    liable for such a deficiency. Similarly claims for usurious
    interest or which could be barred by an agreement between the
    creditor and the debtor would be disallowed.
      Section 502(b)(7)(A) represents a compromise between the House
    bill and the Senate amendment. The House amendment takes the
    provision in H.R. 8200 as passed by the House of Representatives
    but increases the percentage from 10 to 15 percent.
      As used in section 502(b)(7), the phrase "lease of real property"
    applies only to a "true" or "bona fide" lease and does not apply to
    financing leases of real property or interests therein, or to
    leases of such property which are intended as security.
      Historically, the limitation on allowable claims of lessors of
    real property was based on two considerations. First, the amount of
    the lessor's damages on breach of a real estate lease was
    considered contingent and difficult to prove. Partly for this
    reason, claims of a lessor of real estate were not provable prior
    to the 1934 amendments, to the Bankruptcy Act [former title 11].
    Second, in a true lease of real property, the lessor retains all
    risks and benefits as to the value of the real estate at the
    termination of the lease. Historically, it was, therefore,
    considered equitable to limit the claims of real estate lessor.
      However, these considerations are not present in "lease
    financing" transactions where, in substance, the "lease" involves a
    sale of the real estate and the rental payments are in substance
    the payment of principal and interest on a secured loan or sale. In
    a financing lease the lessor is essentially a secured or unsecured
    creditor (depending upon whether his interest is perfected or not)
    of the debtor, and the lessor's claim should not be subject to the
    502(b)(7) limitation. Financing "leases" are in substance
    installment sales or loans. The "lessors" are essentially sellers
    or lenders and should be treated as such for purposes of the
    bankruptcy law.
      Whether a "lease" is true or bona fide lease or, in the
    alternative a financing "lease" or a lease intended as security,
    depends upon the circumstances of each case. The distinction
    between a true lease and a financing transaction is based upon the
    economic substance of the transaction and not, for example, upon
    the locus of title, the form of the transaction or the fact that
    the transaction is denominated as a "lease." The fact that the
    lessee, upon compliance with the terms of the lease, becomes or has
    the option to become the owner of the leased property for no
    additional consideration or for nominal consideration indicates
    that the transaction is a financing lease or lease intended as
    security. In such cases, the lessor has no substantial interest in
    the leased property at the expiration of the lease term. In
    addition, the fact that the lessee assumes and discharges
    substantially all the risks and obligations ordinarily attributed
    to the outright ownership of the property is more indicative of a
    financing transaction than of a true lease. The rental payments in
    such cases are in substance payments of principal and interest
    either on a loan secured by the leased real property or on the
    purchase of the leased real property. See, e.g., Financial
    Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 13 and SEC Reg. S-X, 17
    C.F.R. sec. 210.3-16(q) (1977); cf. First National Bank of Chicago
    v. Irving Trust Co., 74 F.2d 263 (2nd Cir. 1934); and Albenda and
    Lief, "Net Lease Financing Transactions Under the Proposed
    Bankruptcy Act of 1973," 30 Business Lawyer, 713 (1975).
      Section 502(c) of the House amendment presents a compromise
    between similar provisions contained in the House bill and the
    Senate amendment. The compromise language is consistent with an
    amendment to the definition of "claim" in section 104(4)(B) of the
    House amendment and requires estimation of any right to an
    equitable remedy for breach of performance if such breach gives
    rise to a right to payment. To the extent language in the House and
    Senate reports indicate otherwise, such language is expressly
    overruled.
      Section 502(e) of the House amendment contains language modifying
    a similar section in the House bill and Senate amendment. Section
    502(e)(1) states the general rule requiring the court to disallow
    any claim for reimbursement or contribution of an entity that is
    liable with the debtor on, or that has secured, the claim of a
    creditor to any extent that the creditor's claim against the estate
    is disallowed. This adopts a policy that a surety's claim for
    reimbursement or contribution is entitled to no better status than
    the claim of the creditor assured by such surety. Section
    502(e)(1)(B) alternatively disallows any claim for reimbursement or
    contribution by a surety to the extent such claim is contingent as
    of the time of allowance. Section 502(e)(2) is clear that to the
    extent a claim for reimbursement or contribution becomes fixed
    after the commencement of the case that it is to be considered a
    prepetition claim for purposes of allowance. The combined effect of
    sections 502(e)(1)(B) and 502(e)(2) is that a surety or codebtor is
    generally permitted a claim for reimbursement or contribution to
    the extent the surety or codebtor has paid the assured party at the
    time of allowance. Section 502(e)(1)(C) alternatively indicates
    that a claim for reimbursement or contribution of a surety or
    codebtor is disallowed to the extent the surety or codebtor
    requests subrogation under section 509 with respect to the rights
    of the assured party. Thus, the surety or codebtor has a choice; to
    the extent a claim for contribution or reimbursement would be
    advantageous, such as in the case where such a claim is secured, a
    surety or codebtor may opt for reimbursement or contribution under
    section 502(e). On the other hand, to the extent the claim for such
    surety or codebtor by way of subrogation is more advantageous, such
    as where such claim is secured, the surety may elect subrogation
    under section 509.
      The section changes current law by making the election identical
    in all other respects. To the extent a creditor's claim is
    satisfied by a surety or codebtor, other creditors should not
    benefit by the surety's inability to file a claim against the
    estate merely because such surety or codebtor has failed to pay
    such creditor's claim in full. On the other hand, to the extent the
    creditor's claim against the estate is otherwise disallowed, the
    surety or codebtor should not be entitled to increased rights by
    way of reimbursement or contribution, to the detriment of competing
    claims of other unsecured creditors, than would be realized by way
    of subrogation.
      While the foregoing scheme is equitable with respect to other
    unsecured creditors of the debtor, it is desirable to preserve
    present law to the extent that a surety or codebtor is not
    permitted to compete with the creditor he has assured until the
    assured party's claim has paid in full. Accordingly, section 509(c)
    of the House amendment subordinates both a claim by way of
    subrogation or a claim for reimbursement or contribution of a
    surety or codebtor to the claim of the assured party until the
    assured party's claim is paid in full.
      Section 502(h) of the House amendment expands similar provisions
    contained in the House bill and the Senate amendment to indicate
    that any claim arising from the recovery of property under section
    522(i), 550, or 553 shall be determined as though it were a
    prepetition claim.
      Section 502(i) of the House amendment adopts a provision
    contained in section 502(j) of H.R. 8200 as passed by the House but
    that was not contained in the Senate amendment.
      Section 502(i) of H.R. 8200 as passed by the House, but was not
    included in the Senate amendment, is deleted as a matter to be left
    to the bankruptcy tax bill next year.
      The House amendment deletes section 502(i) of the Senate bill but
    adopts the policy of that section to a limited extent for
    confirmation of a plan of reorganization in section 1111(b) of the
    House amendment.
      Section 502(j) of the House amendment is new. The provision
    codifies section 57k of the Bankruptcy Act [section 93(k) of former
    title 11].
      Allowance of Claims or Interest: The House amendment adopts
    section 502(b)(9) of the House bill which disallows any tax claim
    resulting from a reduction of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act
    (FUTA) credit (sec. 3302 of the Internal Revenue Code [26 U.S.C.
    3302]) on account of a tardy contribution to a State unemployment
    fund if the contribution is attributable to ways or other
    compensation paid by the debtor before bankruptcy. The Senate
    amendment allowed this reduction, but would have subordinated it to
    other claims in the distribution of the estate's assets by treating
    it as a punitive (nonpecuniary loss) penalty. The House amendment
    would also not bar reduction of the FUTA credit on account of a
    trustee's late payment of a contribution to a State unemployment
    fund if the contribution was attributable to a trustee's payment of
    compensation earned from the estate.
      Section 511 of the Senate amendment is deleted. Its substance is
    adopted in section 502(b)(9) of the House amendment which reflects
    an identical provision contained in H.R. 8200 as passed by the
    House.

                         SENATE REPORT NO. 95-989                     
      A proof of claim or interest is prima facie evidence of the claim
    or interest. Thus, it is allowed under subsection (a) unless a
    party in interest objects. The rules and case law will determine
    who is a party in interest for purposes of objection to allowance.
    The case law is well developed on this subject today. As a result
    of the change in the liability of a general partner's estate for
    the debts of this partnership, see proposed 11 U.S.C. 723, the
    category of persons that are parties in interest in the partnership
    case will be expanded to include a creditor of a partner against
    whose estate the trustee of the partnership estate may proceed
    under proposed 11 U.S.C. 723(c).
      Subsection (b) prescribes the grounds on which a claim may be
    disallowed. The court will apply these standards if there is an
    objection to a proof of claim. The burden of proof on the issue of
    allowance is left to the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Under the
    current chapter XIII rules, a creditor is required to prove that
    his claim is free from usury, rule 13-301. It is expected that the
    rules will make similar provision for both liquidation and
    individual repayment plan cases. See Bankruptcy Act Sec. 656(b)
    [section 1056(b) of former title 11]; H.R. 31, 94th Cong., 1st
    sess., sec. 6-104(a) (1975).
      Paragraph (1) requires disallowance if the claim is unenforceable
    against the debtor for any reason (such as usury,
    unconscionability, or failure of consideration) other than because
    it is contingent or unmatured. All such contingent or unmatured
    claims are to be liquidated by the bankruptcy court in order to
    afford the debtor complete bankruptcy relief; these claims are
    generally not provable under present law.
      Paragraph (2) requires disallowance to the extent that the claim
    is for unmatured interest as of the date of the petition. Whether
    interest is matured or unmatured on the date of bankruptcy is to be
    determined without reference to any ipso facto or bankruptcy clause
    in the agreement creating the claim. Interest disallowed under this
    paragraph includes postpetition interest that is not yet due and
    payable, and any portion of prepaid interest that represents an
    original discounting of the claim, yet that would not have been
    earned on the date of bankruptcy. For example, a claim on a $1,000
    note issued the day before bankruptcy would only be allowed to the
    extent of the cash actually advanced. If the original discount was
    10 percent so that the cash advanced was only $900, then
    notwithstanding the face amount of note, only $900 would be
    allowed. If $900 was advanced under the note some time before
    bankruptcy, the interest component of the note would have to be
    prorated and disallowed to the extent it was for interest after the
    commencement of the case.
      Section 502(b) thus contains two principles of present law.
    First, interest stops accruing at the date of the filing of the
    petition, because any claim for unmatured interest is disallowed
    under this paragraph. Second, bankruptcy operates as the
    acceleration of the principal amount of all claims against the
    debtor. One unarticulated reason for this is that the discounting
    factor for claims after the commencement of the case is equivalent
    to contractual interest rate on the claim. Thus, this paragraph
    does not cause disallowance of claims that have not been discounted
    to a present value because of the irrebuttable presumption that the
    discounting rate and the contractual interest rate (even a zero
    interest rate) are equivalent.
      Paragraph (3) requires disallowance of a claim to the extent that
    the creditor may offset the claim against a debt owing to the
    debtor. This will prevent double recovery, and permit the claim to
    be filed only for the balance due. This follows section 68 of the
    Bankruptcy Act [section 108 of former title 11].
      Paragraph (4) requires disallowance of a property tax claim to
    the extent that the tax due exceeds the value of the property. This
    too follows current law to the extent the property tax is ad
    valorem.
      Paragraph (5) prevents overreaching by the debtor's attorneys and
    concealing of assets by debtors. It permits the court to examine
    the claim of a debtor's attorney independently of any other
    provision of this subsection, and to disallow it to the extent that
    it exceeds the reasonable value of the attorneys' services.
      Postpetition alimony, maintenance or support claims are
    disallowed under paragraph (6). They are to be paid from the
    debtor's postpetition property, because the claims are
    nondischargeable.
      Paragraph (7), derived from current law, limits the damages
    allowable to a landlord of the debtor. The history of this
    provision is set out at length in Oldden v. Tonto Realty Co., 143
    F.2d 916 (2d Cir. 1944). It is designed to compensate the landlord
    for his loss while not permitting a claim so large (based on a long-
    term lease) as to prevent other general unsecured creditors from
    recovering a dividend from the estate. The damages a landlord may
    assert from termination of a lease are limited to the rent reserved
    for the greater of one year or ten percent of the remaining lease
    term, not to exceed three years, after the earlier of the date of
    the filing of the petition and the date of surrender or
    repossession in a chapter 7 case and 3 years lease payments in a
    chapter 9, 11, or 13 case. The sliding scale formula for chapter 7
    cases is new and designed to protect the long-term lessor. This
    subsection does not apply to limit administrative expense claims
    for use of the leased premises to which the landlord is otherwise
    entitled.
      This paragraph will not overrule Oldden, or the proposition for
    which it has been read to stand: To the extent that a landlord has
    a security deposit in excess of the amount of his claim allowed
    under this paragraph, the excess comes into the estate. Moreover,
    his allowed claim is for his total damages, as limited by this
    paragraph. By virtue of proposed 11 U.S.C. 506(a) and 506(d), the
    claim will be divided into a secured portion and an unsecured
    portion in those cases in which the deposit that the landlord holds
    is less than his damages. As under Oldden, he will not be permitted
    to offset his actual damages against his security deposit and then
    claim for the balance under this paragraph. Rather, his security
    deposit will be applied in satisfaction of the claim that is
    allowed under this paragraph.
      As used in section 502(b)(7), the phrase "lease of real property"
    applies only to a "true" or "bona fide" lease and does not apply to
    financing leases of real property or interests therein, or to
    leases of such property which are intended as security.
      Historically, the limitation on allowable claims of lessors of
    real property was based on two considerations. First, the amount of
    the lessors damages on breach of a real estate lease was considered
    contingent and difficult to prove. Partly for this reason, claims
    of a lessor of real estate were not provable prior to the 1934
    amendments to the Bankruptcy Act [former title 11]. Second, in a
    true lease of real property, the lessor retains all risk and
    benefits as to the value of the real estate at the termination of
    the lease. Historically, it was, therefore, considered equitable to
    limit the claims of a real estate lessor.
      However, these considerations are not present in "lease
    financing" transactions where, in substance, the "lease" involves a
    sale of the real estate and the rental payments are in substance
    the payment of principal and interest on a secured loan or sale. In
    a financing lease the lessor is essentially a secured or unsecured
    creditor (depending upon whether his interest is perfected or not)
    of the debtor, and the lessor's claim should not be subject to the
    502(b)(7) limitation. Financing "leases" are in substance
    installment sales or loans. The "lessors" are essentially sellers
    or lenders and should be treated as such for purposes of the
    bankruptcy law.
      Whether a "lease" is true or bona fide lease or, in the
    alternative, a financing "lease" or a lease intended as security,
    depends upon the circumstances of each case. The distinction
    between a true lease and a financing transaction is based upon the
    economic substance of the transaction and not, for example, upon
    the locus of title, the form of the transaction or the fact that
    the transaction is denominated as a "lease". The fact that the
    lessee, upon compliance with the terms of the lease, becomes or has
    the option to become the owner of the leased property for no
    additional consideration or for nominal consideration indicates
    that the transaction is a financing lease or lease intended as
    security. In such cases, the lessor has no substantial interest in
    the leased property at the expiration of the lease term. In
    addition, the fact that the lessee assumes and discharges
    substantially all the risks and obligations ordinarily attributed
    to the outright ownership of the property is more indicative of a
    financing transaction than of a true lease. The rental payments in
    such cases are in substance payments of principal and interest
    either on a loan secured by the leased real property or on the
    purchase of the leased real property. See, e. g., Financial
    Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 13 and SEC Reg. S-X, 17
    C.F.R. sec. 210.3-16(q) (1977); cf. First National Bank of Chicago
    v. Irving Trust Co., 74 F.2d 263 (2nd Cir. 1934); and Albenda and
    Lief, "Net Lease Financing Transactions Under the Proposed
    Bankruptcy Act of 1973," 30 Business Lawyer, 713 (1975).
      Paragraph (8) is new. It tracks the landlord limitation on
    damages provision in paragraph (7) for damages resulting from the
    breach by the debtor of an employment contract, but limits the
    recovery to the compensation reserved under an employment contract
    for the year following the earlier of the date of the petition and
    the termination of employment.
      Subsection (c) requires the estimation of any claim liquidation
    of which would unduly delay the closing of the estate, such as a
    contingent claim, or any claim for which applicable law provides
    only an equitable remedy, such as specific performance. This
    subsection requires that all claims against the debtor be converted
    into dollar amounts.
      Subsection (d) is derived from present law. It requires
    disallowance of a claim of a transferee of a voidable transfer in
    toto if the transferee has not paid the amount or turned over the
    property received as required under the sections under which the
    transferee's liability arises.
      Subsection (e) also derived from present law, requires
    disallowance of the claim for reimbursement or contribution of a
    codebtor, surety or guarantor of an obligation of the debtor,
    unless the claim of the creditor on such obligation has been paid
    in full. The provision prevents competition between a creditor and
    his guarantor for the limited proceeds in the estate.
      Subsection (f) specifies that "involuntary gap" creditors receive
    the same treatment as prepetition creditors. Under the allowance
    provisions of this subsection, knowledge of the commencement of the
    case will be irrelevant. The claim is to be allowed "the same as if
    such claim had arisen before the date of the filing of the
    petition." Under voluntary petition, proposed 11 U.S.C. 303(f),
    creditors must be permitted to deal with the debtor and be assured
    that their claims will be paid. For purposes of this subsection,
    "creditors" include governmental units holding claims for tax
    liabilities incurred during the period after the petition is filed
    and before the earlier of the order for relief or appointment of a
    trustee.
      Subsection (g) gives entities injured by the rejection of an
    executory contract or unexpired lease, either under section 365 or
    under a plan or reorganization, a prepetition claim for any
    resulting damages, and requires that the injured entity be treated
    as a prepetition creditor with respect to that claim.
      Subsection (h) gives a transferee of a setoff that is recovered
    by one trustee a prepetition claim for the amount recovered.
      Subsection (i) answers the nonrecourse loan problem and gives the
    creditor an unsecured claim for the difference between the value of
    the collateral and the debt in response to the decision in Great
    National Life Ins. Co. v. Pine Gate Associates, Ltd., Bankruptcy
    Case No. B75-4345A (N.D.Ga. Sept. 16, 1977).
      The bill, as reported, deletes a provision in the bill as
    originally introduced (former sec. 502(i)) requiring a tax
    authority to file a proof of claim for recapture of an investment
    credit where, during title 11 proceedings, the trustee sells or
    otherwise disposes of property before the title 11 case began. The
    tax authority should not be required to submit a formal claim for a
    taxable event (a sale or other disposition of the asset) of whose
    occurrence the trustee necessarily knows better than the taxing
    authority. For procedural purposes, the recapture of investment
    credit is to be treated as an administrative expense, as to which
    only a request for payment is required.

                          HOUSE REPORT NO. 95-595                      
      Paragraph (9) [of subsec. (b)] requires disallowance of certain
    employment tax claims. These relate to a Federal tax credit for
    State unemployment insurance taxes which is disallowed if the State
    tax is paid late. This paragraph disallows the Federal claim for
    the tax the same as if the credit had been allowed in full on the
    Federal return.

-REFTEXT-
                            REFERENCES IN TEXT                        
      The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, referred to in subsec.
    (b)(9), are set out in the Appendix to this title.


-MISC2-
                                AMENDMENTS                            
      2005 - Subsec. (b)(9). Pub. L. 109-8, Sec. 716(d), inserted ",
    and except that in a case under chapter 13, a claim of a
    governmental unit for a tax with respect to a return filed under
    section 1308 shall be timely if the claim is filed on or before the
    date that is 60 days after the date on which such return was filed
    as required" before period at end.
      Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 109-8, Sec. 910(b), designated existing
    provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
      Subsec. (k). Pub. L. 109-8, Sec. 201(a), added subsec. (k).
      1994 - Subsec. (b)(9). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 213(a), added par.
    (9).
      Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 304(h)(1), substituted
    "507(a)(8)" for "507(a)(7)".
      1986 - Subsec. (b)(6)(A)(ii). Pub. L. 99-554, Sec. 283(f)(1),
    substituted "repossessed" for "reposessed".
      Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 99-554, Sec. 257(j), inserted reference to
    chapter 12.
      Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 99-554, Sec. 283(f)(2), substituted
    "507(a)(7)" for "507(a)(6)".
      1984 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(a), inserted
    "general" before "partner".
      Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(1), (2), in provisions
    preceding par. (1), inserted "(e)(2)," after "subsections" and "in
    lawful currency of the United States" after "claim".
      Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(3), substituted "and"
    for ", and unenforceable against".
      Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(5), inserted "the"
    after "exceeds".
      Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(4), struck out par. (3) "such claim
    may be offset under section 553 of this title against a debt owing
    to the debtor;", and redesignated par. (4) as (3).
      Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(4), redesignated par.
    (5) as (4). Former par. (4) redesignated (3).
      Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(6), substituted "such
    claim" for "the claim" and struck out the comma after "petition".
      Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(4), redesignated par. (6) as (5).
    Former par. (5) redesignated (4).
      Subsec. (b)(6). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(4), redesignated par.
    (7) as (6). Former par. (6) redesignated (5).
      Subsec. (b)(7). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(7)(A), inserted "the
    claim of an employee" before "for damages".
      Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(4), redesignated par. (8) as (7).
    Former par. (7) redesignated (6).
      Subsec. (b)(7)(A)(i). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(7)(B),
    substituted "or" for "and".
      Subsec. (b)(7)(B). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(7)(C), (D),
    substituted "any" for "the" and inserted a comma after "such
    contract".
      Subsec. (b)(8), (9). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(b)(4), redesignated
    par. (9) as (8). Former par. (8) redesignated (7).
      Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(c)(1), inserted "the"
    before "fixing" and substituted "administration" for "closing".
      Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(c)(2), inserted "right
    to payment arising from a" after "any" and struck out "if such
    breach gives rise to a right to payment" after "breach of
    performance".
      Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(d)(1), (2), in
    provisions preceding subpar. (A) substituted ", (b), and (c)" for
    "and (b)" and substituted "or has secured" for ", or has secured,".
      Subsec. (e)(1)(B). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(d)(3), inserted "or
    disallowance" after "allowance".
      Subsec. (e)(1)(C). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(d)(4), substituted
    "asserts a right of subrogation to the rights of such creditor" for
    "requests subrogation" and struck out "to the rights of such
    creditor" after "of this title".
      Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(e), substituted "522" for
    "522(i)".
      Subsec. (j). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 445(f), amended subsec. (j)
    generally, inserting provisions relating to reconsideration of a
    disallowed claim, and provisions relating to reconsideration of a
    claim under this subsection.

                     EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2005 AMENDMENT                 
      Amendment by Pub. L. 109-8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20,
    2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this
    title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see
    section 1501 of Pub. L. 109-8, set out as a note under section 101
    of this title.

                     EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1994 AMENDMENT                 
      Amendment by Pub. L. 103-394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not
    applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before
    Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103-394, set out as a
    note under section 101 of this title.

                     EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1986 AMENDMENT                 
      Amendment by section 257 of Pub. L. 99-554 effective 30 days
    after Oct. 27, 1986, but not applicable to cases commenced under
    this title before that date, see section 302(a), (c)(1) of Pub. L.
    99-554, set out as a note under section 581 of Title 28, Judiciary
    and Judicial Procedure.
      Amendment by section 283 of Pub. L. 99-554 effective 30 days
    after Oct. 27, 1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99-554.

                     EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1984 AMENDMENT                 
      Amendment by Pub. L. 98-353 effective with respect to cases filed
    90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98-353,
    set out as a note under section 101 of this title.